TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

City of Sacramento v. Hickman

CITY OF SACRAMENTO v. IRENE HICKMAN, as Assessor, etc.

City of Sacramento v. Hickman, 428 P.2d 602 (Cal. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1967
Docket
No. Sac. No. 7804
Judges
Mosk
Citations
428 P.2d 60266 Cal. 2d 101059 Cal. Rptr. 6181967 Cal. LEXIS 364

Opinion of the Court — Mosk

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

MOSK, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent county assessor to comply with Revenue and Taxation Code section 401. Pursuant to a 1965 agreement between the County of Sacramento and petitioner, the latter transferred to respondent the duty to assess all taxable property within its boundaries. (Gov. Code, § 51500 et seq.)

The sole issue is the constitutionality of section 401. The identical question was presented in County of Sacramento v. Hickman (1967) ante, p. 593 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 428 P.2d 593 ], this day filed. For the reasons set forth in that opinion, we hold section 401 to be valid.

The demurrer is overruled. Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed. This order is final forthwith.

Traynor, C. J., McComb, J., Peters, J., Tobriner, J., Burke, J., and Sullivan, J., concurred.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cnty. of Sacramento v. Hickman, 428 P.2d 593 (Cal. 1967) 123

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list