TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Taylor

In re Taylor, 10 P. 88 (Cal. 1886)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 27, 1886
Docket
No. 20,135
Citations
10 P. 882 Cal. Unrep. 6481886 Cal. LEXIS 877
Syllabus
Contempt.-—Order to Show Cause Discharged and proceedings dismissed.1
Summary
Proceedings against respondent for alleged contempt of court.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the COURT.

This cause is ruled by the decision in the case entitled “In re Buckley, 69 Cal. 1 , 10 Pac. 88 , charged with contempt,” and therefore it is ordered that the order *649 to show cause herein be discharged and the proceedings dismissed.

We dissent: Ross J.; McKinstry, J.; McKee, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11917: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Nies v. Anderson179 Iowa 326 (1917)
  2. Sawyer v. Hutchinson127 N.W. 1089 (Iowa 1910)

Most recent

  1. Nies v. Anderson179 Iowa 326 (1917)
  2. Sawyer v. Hutchinson127 N.W. 1089 (Iowa 1910)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Buckley, 10 P. 69 (Cal. 1886) 36

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list