Childs v. Edmunds
CHILDS v. EDMUNDS, Judge, etc.
Childs v. Edmunds, 10 P. 130 (Cal. 1886)
Syllabus
Prohibition.—The Enforcement of a Writ of Assistance, as against one not a party to the action, cannot be restrained by a writ of prohibition, as there is in such ease an adequate remedy at law by appeal from the order granting the writ.1
Summary
Application for writ of prohibition to restrain the enforcement of a writ of assistance, obtained against petitioner for the purpose of dispossessing him, in a foreclosure suit to which he was not a party.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the COURT.
The application for a writ of prohibition in this case is denied for the reason that petitioner has an adequate remedy by appeal from the order complained of.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.