TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

David L. Hunter v. J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Municipal Corporation, Ypsilanti Police Department

David L. Hunter, Cross-Appellee v. J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer, Cross-Appellants, Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Municipal Corporation, Ypsilanti Police Department

Hunter v. J.T. Anderson, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a Mun. Corp., Ypsilanti Police Dep't, 932 F.2d 968 (6th Cir. 1991)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 13, 1991
Docket
No. 91-1225
Citations
932 F.2d 9681991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14558
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

932 F.2d 968

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. David L. HUNTER, Plaintiff-Appellant Cross-Appellee, v. J.T. ANDERSON, Officer, Eugene Rush, City of Ypsilanti Police Officer, Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants, Robert Huff, Chief, Charles Kirby, Lieutenant, City of Ypsilanti, a municipal corporation, Ypsilanti Police Department, Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 91-1225, 91-1263.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 13, 1991.

1

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ALDRICH, District Judge. *

ORDER 2

On January 10, 1991, the district court entered an order in this civil rights action denying the pro se plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment except as to a claim of excessive force against defendants Anderson and Rush. The plaintiff's appeal from that order was docketed with this court as Case No. 91-1225. The cross-appeal by Anderson and Rush was docketed as Case No. 91-1263.

3

On April 15, 1991, a panel of this court sua sponte dismissed Case No. 91-1225 for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was neither final for purposes of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 nor certified for an interlocutory appeal under Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. A review of the remaining cross-appeal reveals no independent basis for appellate jurisdiction which would cure the deficiencies found in Case No. 91-1225.

4

It therefore is ORDERED that Case No. 91-1263 is dismissed sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction herein.

* The Honorable Ann Aldrich, District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list