In re Tyler
In re Disbarment of TYLER
In re Tyler, 13 P. 169 (Cal. 1887)
Syllabus
Attorneys—Disbarment—Motion for New Trial.—Where the supreme court has, by its judgment, disbarred an attorney, a motion for a new trial will not be heard by it.
Summary
This was a motion for a new trial of the case of In re Tyler, 12 Pac. 289, which was heard before the supreme court of California, December 3, 1886, when said attorney was disbarred by the judgment of the supreme court.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
By the COURT.
The motion for a new trial is not the proper remedy in this cause. Considered as a petition for a rehearing, we see no reason to grant it.
Motion for a new trial and a rehearing denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.