TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Broder v. Superior Court

BRODER v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MONO COUNTY

Broder v. Superior Court, 33 P. 630 (Cal. 1893)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 27, 1893
Docket
No. 15,169
Citations
33 P. 6303 Cal. Unrep. 886
Syllabus
Writ of Review—When Denied.—The Petition for a Writ of review to an order vacating a judgment for petitioner will be denied, where it appears that petitioner appealed from the same order, and the questions sought to be reviewed have been determined thereon.
Summary
Original application by John Broder for a writ of review to the superior court of Mono county. Application denied.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks herein for a review and annulment of an order of the superior court of Mono county, made May 13, 1892, striking from the files, and canceling of record, a certain document, purporting to be a judgment in the action of Broder v. Conklin, then pending in said court. The application for the writ was filed in this court September 2, 1892, and upon the return thereto it appeared that the petitioner herein took an appeal to this court from the same order on the eleventh day of July, 1892. That appeal having been heard and determined at the instance of the appellant ( 98 Cal. 360 , 33 Pac. 211 ), it is evident that the grounds upon which he is entitled to ask for the writ of review do not exist, and the application therefor is denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1913: 119132026peak 1913 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Tebbetts v. Rickart158 S.W. 843 (Mo. 1913)

Most recent

  1. Tebbetts v. Rickart158 S.W. 843 (Mo. 1913)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Broder v. Conklin, 33 P. 211 (Cal. 1893) 42

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list