Helsel v. Seeger
Helsel v. Seeger, 34 P. 237 (Cal. 1893)
Syllabus
Bill of Exceptions.—A Paper in the Transcript, Denominated a “bill of exceptions,” not certified by the clerk to be a correct copy of any bill of exceptions on file, and not containing any specific exceptions to any particular finding of the court, will not be considered by the supreme court.
Summary
APPEAL from Superior Court, Kern County; A. R. Conklin, Judge.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DE HAVEN, J.
The findings are sufficient to sustain the judgment. The paper found in the transcript and denominated a “bill of exceptions” is not certified by the clerk to be a correct copy of any bill of exceptions on file, nor does it contain any specific exception to any particular finding of the court. Judgment affirmed.
We concur: Fitzgerald, J.; McFarland, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.