TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ex parte Vinton

Ex parte Vinton, 47 P. 1019 (Cal. 1897)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
California Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 2, 1897
Docket
No. Crim. No. 263
Judges
Garoutte
Citations
47 P. 10195 Cal. Unrep. 624
Disposition
Granted.
Cited by 5
Syllabus
Habeas Corpus.—A Prisoner not Brought to Trial Within Sixty Days after commitment will be discharged on habeas eorpus.1
Summary
Application of John M. Vinton for discharge on habeas corpus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner discharged.

Dissent — Garoutte

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

GAROUTTE, J.

I dissent. The prisoner is discharged by the court upon the ground that he has not been brought to trial within sixty days after his commitment. I am well satisfied that the writ of habeas corpus cannot be invoked in a case of this character.

I concur: Temple, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1911: 11915: 11928: 11939: 11963: 119112026peak 1911 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Alpine265 P. 947 (Cal. 1928)
  2. People v. Wilson383 P.2d 452 (Cal. 1963)
  3. Von Feldstein v. State150 P. 235 (Ariz. 1915)
  4. State v. Douglas95 P.2d 560 (Ariz. 1939)
  5. Ford v. Superior Court118 P. 96 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)

Most recent

  1. People v. Wilson383 P.2d 452 (Cal. 1963)
  2. State v. Douglas95 P.2d 560 (Ariz. 1939)
  3. In re Alpine265 P. 947 (Cal. 1928)
  4. Von Feldstein v. State150 P. 235 (Ariz. 1915)
  5. Ford v. Superior Court118 P. 96 (Cal. Ct. App. 1911)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list