Ashton v. Heydenfeldt
Ashton v. Heydenfeldt, 56 P. 1031 (Cal. 1899)
Syllabus
Appeal—Amendment of Judgment.—The Supreme Court will not amend its judgment directing a demurrer to the complaint to be overruled, by adding thereto a direction that respondents be allowed to answer, as application for leave to answer can be made to the trial court.
Summary
Motion to amend the judgment of the supreme court. Motion denied.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
PER CURIAM.
Respondents move to amend the judgment rendered, which directs that the demurrer to the complaint be overruled, by adding thereto a direction that respondents be allowed to answer; but this direction is not necessary, because the court below, if a proper showing be made, will undoubtedly allow the respondents to answer.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.