TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jacobs v. Hooker

Jacobs v. Hooker, 1 Barb. 71 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1847)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
September 27, 1847
Judges
Edmonds
Citations
1 Barb. 71
Headnotes
Where papers are served by mail, in the manner directed by the rules, the risk of miscarriage is with the party to whom they are directed. No costs are allowed on motions, unless such motions are necessary, for the attainment of some substantial right in the cause; except they are awarded by way of punishment.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Edmonds

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Edmonds, J.

That makes no difference. The risk of miscarriage falls upon him to whom the paper was directed. The rule says that such a service shall be a good one; and of necessity, therefore, the risk must be with the party to whom it is sent. Both judgments were irregular and must be set aside; but without costs. We allow no costs on motions, unless the motions are rendered necessary for the attainment of some substantial right in the cause; except sometimes we may allow them by way of punishment. My only doubt is whether I ought not to charge the defendant with the costs of setting aside his judgment. When he received the costs of the circuit after the stipulation, he knew why they were paid, and that was enough to put him on inquiry. He ought not, after that, to have perfected the judgment. I will allow the costs of the motion to set aside that judgment to abide the event. No other costs of these motions, either way, will be allowed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1880–1881: 11892–1893: 11910–1911: 11932–1933: 11946–1947: 11966–1967: 11968–1969: 11970–1971: 218802026peak 1970 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hurley v. Olcott91 N.E. 270 (N.Y. 1910)
  2. McCoy v. State Employment Bureau77 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947)
  3. Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Commission157 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1968)
  4. Boeck v. State Highway Commission153 N.W.2d 610 (Wis. 1967)
  5. Manchester v. Van Brunt22 N.Y.S. 362 (1893)
  6. Buffalo Cadillac Corp. v. Eisele148 Misc. 592 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1933)

Most recent

  1. In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & Gilbert35 A.D.2d 21 (1970)
  2. State-Wide Insurance v. Mingione65 Misc. 2d 310 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1970)
  3. Schroedel Corp. v. State Highway Commission157 N.W.2d 562 (Wis. 1968)
  4. Boeck v. State Highway Commission153 N.W.2d 610 (Wis. 1967)
  5. McCoy v. State Employment Bureau77 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 1947)
  6. Buffalo Cadillac Corp. v. Eisele148 Misc. 592 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1933)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list