TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Babcock v. Stanley

Babcock against Stanley

Babcock v. Stanley, 11 Johns. 178 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1814)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
May 15, 1814
Citations
11 Johns. 178
Headnotes
In order to maintain an action for the pnceofserwce must & delivery, or of-Whether a pal toLhoHeTthe services of a ara™ of goods,' tute of frauds! dabitatur.
Summary
IN ERROR, on certiorari, from a justice's court. Stanley . . u ° brought an action against Babcock, before the justice. On the jgj. Qc¿0¿er^ 1812, he declared on an agreement, stating that B. a£reed to purchase of him the service of a certain negro woman, for four years, at ten dollars per annum, which S. agreed to accept; and that B. had refused to perform the contracti pleaded the statute of frauds. There was no evidence that the negro woman was delivered, or offered to be delivered, by S. to B., or that any earnest money was paid, or a note or memorandum in writing made of the agreement. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiff below.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

It may be questionable whether the contract for the sale of the service of the negro woman, could be considered as a sale of goods, &c. within the statute for the prevention of frauds: but it was incumbent on the plaintiff below to show a performance on his part, by an offer of the wench to the defendant, before he called upon him for the payment of the money. (2 Saund. Rep. 252. n. 3.) No such offer appears to have been made. The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1846–1847: 11910–1911: 118462026peak 1846 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Johnson v. Watson1 Ga. 348 (1846)
  2. Glynn v. The City of Oswego71 Misc. 592 (1911)

Most recent

  1. Glynn v. The City of Oswego71 Misc. 592 (1911)
  2. Johnson v. Watson1 Ga. 348 (1846)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list