TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Norval v. Cornell

Mary Norval against Cornell

Norval v. Cornell, 16 Johns. 73 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1819)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
January 15, 1819
Citations
16 Johns. 73
Headnotes
Under the 9tU section of the act relative id turnpikes, sesK, 30. c. 38. (I N. R. h. 334.) a toll-gatherer is not liable to the penalty of five dollars, for demanding toll of a person exempted from paying it; but only when he hinders or delays travellers and passengers bound to pay toll, or takes more toll than the law allows.
Summary
IN ERROR, on certiorari to a Justice’s Court. The defendant in error brought an action in the Court below against the plaintiff in error, who was a toll-gatherer at one of the gates of the New Windsor and Cornwall turnpike road, for stopping and demanding toll of his son while returning from the mill with his team, and not letting him pass until he paid the toll. It was proved that the plaintiff’s son went with his father’s team and grist to a mill, and passed the gate on his way to the mill, without being required to pay toll; that he returned without the grist, not being able to get it ground that day; that on being required to pay toll, he stated this fact to the- defendant below* but she would not let him pass without paying it. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiff below, for five dollars, with costs,'

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The only question is, whether the penalty was incurred or not. The case of Conkling v. Elting (2 Johns. Rep. 410.) is in point, that the 9th section of the act relative to turnpikes, (1 N.R. L. 234.) does not apply, or inflict a penalty, where toll is demanded of a person entitled to an exemption from paying it. It applies only to the hindering or delaying travellers and passengers bound to pay toll, or for taking more toll than the law allows.

Judgment reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1856–1857: 11872–1873: 11884–1885: 118562026peak 1856 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Van Buren v. Wylie23 N.W. 195 (Mich. 1885)
  2. Marr v. Barrett41 Me. 403 (1856)
  3. Starkweather v. Prince8 D.C. 144 (1873)

Most recent

  1. Van Buren v. Wylie23 N.W. 195 (Mich. 1885)
  2. Starkweather v. Prince8 D.C. 144 (1873)
  3. Marr v. Barrett41 Me. 403 (1856)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list