TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jackson ex dem. Low v. Hornbeck

Jackson, ex dem. Low, against Hornbeck

Jackson ex dem. Low v. Hornbeck, 2 Johns. Cas. 115 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1800)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
October 15, 1800
Citations
2 Johns. Cas. 115
Headnotes
The two days allowed by the rule of January term, 1799, for making up a case cannot be enlarged by the order of a judge.
Summary
Bowman moved to vacate a certificate of a judge, giving further time to make up a case.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The two days allowed by the 6th rule of January term, 1799, for making a case, cannot he enlarged by a judge, in favor of a party making the case ; but the time, which may be enlarged, under that rule, is that allowed for proposing amendments, and for giving notice of an appearance before the judge, and no other.

Bule granted.( b )

(b) “ The time for preparing a Gase, bill of exceptions, special verdict, or demurrer to evidence, and the time, for preparing amendments thereto, may be enlarged by the judge before whom the cause Was tried, or by one of the justices of this court, but not by any other officer Rule 39 ; 9 Johns. 264 ; 2 Johns. Gas. 115 ; S. C. Colem. 127 ;'but an order for time to make a case, cannot be enlarged after it has expired, but only while it is running ; if it once expire, relief can be had by motion to the court only, for which purpose, a judge may grant an order to stay proceedings. 7 Cowen, 467. Where the case is made subject to the opinion of, the court, it need not be prepared at the trial, but a minute of the questions to be presented, and the evidence on which they arise, may be made, and the case may be subsequently drawn up, amended, and settled within such times and under the same regulations, as are above made with respect to cases, Rule 38. The same practice ap *116 plies, also, in relation to feigned issues from chancery, as regards the preparing and settling of the case, where either party intends to apply to the court of chancery, for a new trial, on the ground of any erroneous decision, or misdirection of the judge, before whom the issue was tried, or that the verdict was against the weight of evidence. Chan. Rule 140.” Grab. Prac. 2d ed. 331, 332.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1812–1813: 11854–1855: 118122026peak 1812 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Coryell v. Holcombe9 N.J. Eq. 650 (1854)
  2. Black v. Brown9 Johns. 264 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1812)

Most recent

  1. Coryell v. Holcombe9 N.J. Eq. 650 (1854)
  2. Black v. Brown9 Johns. 264 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1812)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list