TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Claim of Pushkarowitz v. A. & M. Kramer

In the Matter of the Claim of Katherine Pushkarowitz, against A. & M. Kramer, and Fund for Reopened Cases, Workmen's Compensation Board

Claim of Pushkarowitz v. A. & M. Kramer, 90 N.E.2d 494 (N.Y. 1950)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 12, 1950
Citations
90 N.E.2d 494300 N.Y. 6371950 N.Y. LEXIS 1431

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fixed and Froessel, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1952: 11954: 219522026peak 1954 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Claim of Aponte v. Santiago & Garcia279 A.D. 269 (1952)
  2. Claim of Maricle v. Glazier283 A.D. 402 (1954)
  3. Claim of Maricle v. Glazier121 N.E.2d 549 (N.Y. 1954) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Claim of Maricle v. Glazier121 N.E.2d 549 (N.Y. 1954) · Dissent
  2. Claim of Maricle v. Glazier283 A.D. 402 (1954)
  3. Claim of Aponte v. Santiago & Garcia279 A.D. 269 (1952)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list