Schnepel v. Board of Education
Thelma B. Schnepel v. Board of Education of the City of Rochester
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
Section 51 of the General Municipal Law authorizes actions by taxpayers against illegal acts of £< all officers, agents, commissioners and other persons acting, or who have acted, for and on behalf of any county, town, village or municipal corporation in this state ”. Section 2 of the same statute defines a “ municipal corporation ” as including ££ only a county, town, city and village.”
A board of education is not a municipal corporation within the meaning of the above provisions (see Hamilton v. Baker, *96 243 N. Y. 578 ; Brooks v. Wyman, 246 N. Y. 534 ; Blackburn v. Clements, 297 N. Y. 971 ). Suggestion of a contrary viewpoint may be found in Lewis v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y. ( 258 N. Y. 117 ) but, in our opinion, should not be accepted.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Loughban, Oh. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and and Froessel, JJ., concur.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 18 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.