TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Auster

In the Matter of the Application of Rose Auster, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to Determine the Custody of William M. Weberman, an Infant. Myron Weberman

In re Auster, 100 N.E.2d 47 (N.Y. 1951)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 1, 1951
Citations
100 N.E.2d 47302 N.Y. 8551951 N.Y. LEXIS 976
Cited by 6

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Froessel, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1951: 11958: 11960: 11977: 11979: 11984: 119512026peak 1951 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Parham v. J. R.442 U.S. 584 (1979)
  2. In re Franz55 A.D.2d 424 (1977)
  3. Paolella v. Phillips27 Misc. 2d 763 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
  4. Aldous v. Aldous99 A.D.2d 197 (1984)
  5. In re Skipwith14 Misc. 2d 325 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1958)
  6. In re Auster100 N.E.2d 56 (N.Y. 1951)

Most recent

  1. Aldous v. Aldous99 A.D.2d 197 (1984)
  2. Parham v. J. R.442 U.S. 584 (1979)
  3. In re Franz55 A.D.2d 424 (1977)
  4. Paolella v. Phillips27 Misc. 2d 763 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1960)
  5. In re Skipwith14 Misc. 2d 325 (N.Y. Fam. Ct. 1958)
  6. In re Auster100 N.E.2d 56 (N.Y. 1951)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list