Fox v. Mission of the Immaculate Virgin for the Protection of Homeless & Destitute Children
Hugh Fox, an Infant, by Agnes O'Rourke, His Guardian ad Litem v. Mission of the Immaculate Virgin for the Protection of Homeless and Destitute Children
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Desmond, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ. Conway, Ch. J., and Froessel, J. dissent and vote to reverse upon the ground that the record presents questions of fact which required the submission to a jury of the question of the contributory negligence of the infant plaintiff. Taking no part: Dye, J.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.