Bartlett v. Sutorius
Bartlett v. Sutorius, 9 N.Y.S. 2 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1890)
Headnotes
Arrest in Civil Cases—Vacation of Order.
Where defendant has been arrested for conversion of money received by him “in a fiduciary capacity, ” the order of arrest will be vacated unless the complaint alleges that the money sued for was received by defendant in a fiduciary capacity.
Summary
Appeal from special term, New York county.
Action by Stephen L. Bartlett against Edward Sutorius, for the proceeds of certain sales alleged to have been made by defendant as plaintiff’s agent. An order of arrest was granted on the ground that defendant converted money received “in a fiduciary capacity,” as agent of plaintiff. The complaint alleged that plaintiff shipped goods to defendant, his agent, to sell, and that defendant collected the proceeds, and failed to account therefor, but converted such proceeds to his own use. The complaint did not allege that defendant received the money in a fiduciary capacity, nor did it allege any further facts in relation thereto than those stated. A motion to vacate the order of arrest was denied, and defendant appeals. For former report, see 6 H. Y. Supp. 406.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The order appealed from should be reversed, and the order of arrest vacated, without costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.