TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Albany Insurance v. McAllister

Albany Ins. Co. v. McAllister

Albany Ins. v. McAllister, 11 N.Y.S. 295 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1890)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
September 25, 1890
Judges
Landon
Citations
11 N.Y.S. 29533 N.Y. St. Rep. 12257 Hun 5941890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 704
Headnotes
Abbbst in Civil Action—Money Received in a Fiduciary Capacity. Under Laws N. Y. 1873. c. 688, providing that an agent of an insurance company “shall be held responsible in a trust or fiduciary capacity for any moneys received by him for such company, ” an arrangement by which such an agent, after deducting commissions and expenses from premiums collected by him, is to account for, and pay monthly, the balance by draft to the company, does not change the relation to that of debtor and creditor; and, on his failure to pay over such monthly balance, he is liable to arrest in an action therefor, as for money received “in any fiduciary capacity, ” within Code Civil Proc. N. Y. § 550, subd. 3.
Summary
Appeal from special term, Albany county. Action by the Albany Insurance Company against Charles McAllister for money collected by him, as agent of plaintiff. An order of arrest against defendant was granted, but, on his motion, was vacated. From the order vacating the order of arrest, plaintiff appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Landon

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Landon, J.

The defendant, as agent of the plaintiff, an insurance company, collected in the usual course of business moneys for premiums upon policies issued by him, and which, after deducting commissions and certain specified expenses, it was his duty to account for and pay monthly by draft to the plaintiff. He rendered his account monthly, showing the balance which he ought to pay, but he did not pay it. He was not required to pay the specific moneys received by him. It was obviously contemplated that he might pay the monthly balance from any funds wífich he could command. Chapter 688, Laws 1873, the first section of which is unrepealed and in force, declares that such an agent “shall be held responsible in a trust or fiduciary capacity for any moneys received by him for such company.” Whatever might have been the capacity in which the defendant received the moneys for the plaintiff, independently of the statute, we think the statute characterizes the transaction. It was doubtless one purpose of the statute to permit such a convenient and periodical accounting and payment as were here agreed upon, without changing the fiduciary character of the relation between agent and principal into that of debtor and creditor with respect to the funds re *296 ceived by the agent. The statute existing, we must give it full force, and assume, in the absence of any evidence indicating a contrary intention, that the parties made their contract in view of the statute, the principal relying upon its protection, and the agent accepting its burden. It follows that the defendant received the moneys in a fiduciary capacity, and by refusing to pay them violated his trust, and hence the order of arrest was properly granted. Order reversed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements; and motion to vacate denied, with $10 costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 11978: 119482026peak 1948 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Western Assur. Co. v. Genesee Valley Trust Co.171 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1948)
  2. Northside Bank of Tampa v. Electrical Enterprises, Inc.353 So. 2d 927 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

Most recent

  1. Northside Bank of Tampa v. Electrical Enterprises, Inc.353 So. 2d 927 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)
  2. Western Assur. Co. v. Genesee Valley Trust Co.171 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1948)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list