Lick v. Town of Moravia
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
No opinion. Court declines to consider this appeal, (submitted without argument,) for the reason that the papers contained in the appeal book are not certified to be “a copy of the papers used before the court on the hearing of the motion,” as required by section 1353 of the Code of Civil Procedure; also that the case, which is a part of the appeal book, was not procured to be settled and signed by the judge before whom the action was tried, as required by sections 997 and 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule 35 of general rules of practice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.