TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Town v. Wilcox

Town v. Wilcox, 12 Wend. 503 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1834)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Supreme Court · State Trial Courts
Decided
October 15, 1834
Judges
Savage
Citations
12 Wend. 503
Headnotes
A submission to arbitration is a discontinuance'of a suit, and if after the commencement of a suit, and before plea pleaded, all actions, &c. be submitted to arbitration, the defendant may plead the fact, in bar of \hs further maintenance of the suit. Such plea not being a plea puis darrein continuance, of course is not subject to the rules governing that plea.
Summary
Demurrer to pleas. In May term 1831, the plaintiff declared in assumpsit. The defendant imparled until May term 1832, when he pleaded, 1. the general issue, and 2. that the plaintiff ought not further to have or maintain his action against him because, since the commencement of the suit, to wit, on the 12th July; 1831, the parties mutually entered into bonds to each other, whereby they submitted to arbitration all, and all manner of action and actions, &c. wherefore he prayed judgment, if the plaintiff ought further to have or maintain his action, &c. There were two other pleas, similar to the second. To the second plea the plaintiff, calling it a plea puis darrein continuance, demurred and assigned as’special causes of demurrer, 1. That it was pleaded with the general issue, and with two other pleas puis darrein ; 2. That the plea does not state the day of the commencement of the suit; 3. That it is double; 4. That there is no proferí of the submission, though alleged to be under seal; 5. That only two of three arbitra, tors heard the proofs, &c.; 6. That there is no proferí of the award, though alleged to be under seal; 7. That it is not alleged that the matter pleaded arose since the last continuance; and 8. That it is not alleged that the award was duly published. There were demurrers also to the third and fourth pleas and similar special causes.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Savage

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

By the Court, Savage, Ch, J.

The pleas are all good, considered in reference to the object for which they were pleaded. They are not pleaded puis darrein continuance. When matter of defence arises after the commencement of the suit, it cannot be pleaded in bar of the action generally ; but if before plea pleaded, it must be pleaded to the further maintenance of the suit. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 635. A plea puis darrein continuance sets up some matter arising after plea pleaded. The rules which govern such pleas are not applicable here.

The object of the pleas was to show a discontinuance of the suit; and that was done by showing that the suit, and all matters in difference, were submitted to arbitrators generally, without any stipulation to enter judgment upon their determination. 2 Wendell, 506 . 18 Johns. R. 22.

Judgment for defendant.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1841–1842: 21847–1848: 21855–1856: 11867–1868: 11869–1870: 11879–1880: 11885–1886: 118412026peak 1841 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jordan v. Hyatt3 Barb. 275 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1848)
  2. Callanan v. Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co.27 N.W. 718 (Mich. 1886)
  3. Ressequie v. Brownson4 Barb. 541 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1848)
  4. Frink v. Ryan4 Ill. 322 (1841)
  5. Crooker v. Buck41 Me. 355 (1856)
  6. Norwood v. Stephens47 Tenn. 1 (1869) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Callanan v. Port Huron & Northwestern Railway Co.27 N.W. 718 (Mich. 1886)
  2. Keep v. Keep24 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 152 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1879)
  3. Norwood v. Stephens47 Tenn. 1 (1869) · Dissent
  4. Lary v. Goodnow48 N.H. 170 (1868)
  5. Crooker v. Buck41 Me. 355 (1856)
  6. Ressequie v. Brownson4 Barb. 541 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1848)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list