Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
Samuel Atkin, Appellants-Respondents v. Hill, Darlington & Grimm
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Orders affirmed, without costs. The questions certified on the appeal and the cross appeal answered in the affirmative. Ho opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Foster and Scileppi. Judges Dye, Van Voorhis and Burke dissent and vote to modify and to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that *943 under the applicable statute criminal liability is the exclusive redress for its violation (Sajor v. Ampol, Inc., 275 N. Y. 125 ; Rosasco Creameries v. Cohen, 276 N. Y. 274 ). The question certified on the cross appeal to this court should be answered in the negative.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts5
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts2
- State Specialty Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.