Ungar v. Sarafite
In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar v. Joseph A. Sarafite, as Judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, Respondent In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar, Joseph A. Sarafite, as Judge of the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York
Subsequent history: aff'd, Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575 (1964). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
In the first above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Ungar, decided herewith.) No opinion.
In the second above-entitled proceeding: Order affirmed, without costs. However, we point out that where the alleged contempt consists of the making of charges of wrongdoing by the Trial Judge himself he should, where disposition of the contempt charge can be withheld until after the trial and where it is otherwise practicable, order the contempt proceeding to be tried before a different Judge. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke, Foster and Scileppi. Judge Van Voorhis concurs in result only.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.