Bachrach v. 1001 Tenants Corp.

Alfred R. Bachrach v. 1001 Tenants Corporation

Bachrach v. 1001 Tenants Corp., 205 N.E.2d 196 (N.Y. 1965)

Court: New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided: January 7, 1965
Citations: 205 N.E.2d 19615 N.Y.2d 718256 N.Y.S.2d 9291965 N.Y. LEXIS 1706

Cited by 2 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(administrative remedy for alleged religious discrimination was exclusive; no action for compensatory damages would be inferred in absence of legislative intent)

City of Miami v. Cosgrove, 516 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Cited by 2 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts2

Relies on it most ⓘ

Gray v. Serruto Builders, Inc.265 A.2d 404 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)
City of Miami v. Cosgrove516 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Most recent

City of Miami v. Cosgrove516 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Gray v. Serruto Builders, Inc.265 A.2d 404 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list