TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the City of New York

In the Matter of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to Real Property Required for Lincoln Square Slum Clearance Project Within the Area Bounded by West 60th Street and Other Streets in the Borough of Manhattan. Schnurmacher Corporation

In re the City of N.Y., 210 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 9, 1965
Citations
210 N.E.2d 45916 N.Y.2d 828263 N.Y.S.2d 1691965 N.Y. LEXIS 1254

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion by appellants Gomatel Realty and Construction Corp. and Pyramid Garage Corp. for reargument denied. Motion by same appellants to amend remittitur to remand case to Appellate Division denied. Motion by same appellants otherwise to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Movants-appellants contended that the application of section 3-a of the General Municipal Law to a judgment or accrued claim arising out of a condemnation proceeding deprived them of their right to just compensation and contended that they received less than just compensation with regard to damage parcels 27 and 412, all in violation of their rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellants’ constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 16 N Y 2d 497.]

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1970: 12008: 119702026peak 1970 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Housing Authority of Little Rock v. Rochelle459 S.W.2d 794 (Ark. 1970)
  2. In re USA Niagara Development Corp.51 A.D.3d 377 (2008)

Most recent

  1. In re USA Niagara Development Corp.51 A.D.3d 377 (2008)
  2. Housing Authority of Little Rock v. Rochelle459 S.W.2d 794 (Ark. 1970)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list