TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

M. Katz & Son Billiard Products, Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc.

M. Katz & Son Billiard Prods., Inc. v. G. Correale & Sons, Inc., 232 N.E.2d 864 (N.Y. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 29, 1967
Citations
232 N.E.2d 86420 N.Y.2d 903285 N.Y.S.2d 8711967 N.Y. LEXIS 1105

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 44 cases

View all citing references →
1968: 11971: 41972: 21973: 21974: 21976: 31978: 11979: 21980: 21981: 31982: 41983: 21984: 31986: 11987: 21994: 11995: 11998: 11999: 12002: 12004: 12006: 12007: 12014: 12015: 119682026peak 1971 · 4

Most recent

  1. Cotia (USA) Ltd. v. Lynn Steel Corp.134 A.D.3d 483 (2015)
  2. Unitrade Corp. v. International Data Systems, Inc.114 A.D.3d 934 (2014)
  3. Fischbarg v. Doucet880 N.E.2d 22 (N.Y. 2007)
  4. Stengel v. Black28 A.D.3d 401 (2006)
  5. Spencer Laminating Corp. v. Denby5 Misc. 3d 200 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 2004)
  6. Plummer v. Massullo, No. 560598 (May 2, 2002)2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 5555 (2002)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list