Mulligan v. Wetchler
Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan v. Bernard Wetchler, and City of New York
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.