TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mulligan v. Wetchler

Mary Mulligan, as Administratrix of the Estate of Bernard Mulligan v. Bernard Wetchler, and City of New York

Mulligan v. Wetchler, 287 N.E.2d 391 (N.Y. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 7, 1972
Citations
287 N.E.2d 39130 N.Y.2d 951335 N.Y.S.2d 7011972 N.Y. LEXIS 1156

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1976: 11982: 11986: 11989: 21997: 119762026peak 1989 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Horton v. Niagara Falls Memorial Center51 A.D.2d 152 (1976)
  2. Bonnot v. Fishman88 A.D.2d 650 (1982)
  3. Shapiro v. Shapiro151 A.D.2d 559 (1989)
  4. King v. Burkowski155 A.D.2d 285 (1989)
  5. Ellis v. Ellis235 A.D.2d 1002 (1997)
  6. YONKERS CITY POST NO. 1666, VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC. v. Josanth Realty Corp.494 N.E.2d 452 (N.Y. 1986)

Most recent

  1. Ellis v. Ellis235 A.D.2d 1002 (1997)
  2. King v. Burkowski155 A.D.2d 285 (1989)
  3. Shapiro v. Shapiro151 A.D.2d 559 (1989)
  4. YONKERS CITY POST NO. 1666, VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES, INC. v. Josanth Realty Corp.494 N.E.2d 452 (N.Y. 1986)
  5. Bonnot v. Fishman88 A.D.2d 650 (1982)
  6. Horton v. Niagara Falls Memorial Center51 A.D.2d 152 (1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list