TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State

Paramount Film Distributing Corporation v. State of New York

Paramount Film Distrib. Corp. v. State, 288 N.E.2d 811 (N.Y. 1972)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 28, 1972
Docket
No. Claim No. 45976
Citations
288 N.E.2d 81131 N.Y.2d 678336 N.Y.S.2d 9111972 N.Y. LEXIS 1113

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz;: Whether lack of a remedy in one proceeding rather than two to declare the licensing statute invalid and also to obtain a refund of licensing fees already paid violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals considered this issue and held that there was no denial of claimant’s constitutional rights (30 N Y 2d 415).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11997: 11999: 12005: 12013: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Kramer ex rel. estate of Chin v. Chin (In re Chin)492 B.R. 117 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2013)
  2. National Bank of Canada v. Artex Industries, Inc.627 F. Supp. 610 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
  3. Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.987 F. Supp. 182 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
  4. Onanuga v. Pfizer, Inc.369 F. Supp. 2d 491 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
  5. State of NY v. SCA Services, Inc.761 F. Supp. 14 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)

Most recent

  1. Kramer ex rel. estate of Chin v. Chin (In re Chin)492 B.R. 117 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 2013)
  2. Onanuga v. Pfizer, Inc.369 F. Supp. 2d 491 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
  3. State of NY v. SCA Services, Inc.761 F. Supp. 14 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
  4. Town of Oyster Bay v. Occidental Chemical Corp.987 F. Supp. 182 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
  5. National Bank of Canada v. Artex Industries, Inc.627 F. Supp. 610 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list