Weinstein v. All State Credit Corp.
Morris Weinstein v. All State Credit Corporation, and Edwina Carew
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order reversed, with costs in, all courts, and the case remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The brder of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs in all courts, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied. The proof of notice of redemtion did not comply with the amended section 5-51.0 (subd. e) of the Nassau County Administrative Code in that it did not disclose the “ means by which the last known address was ascertained ”. Strict compliance with the proof of notice provision was required before the tax deed could be executed (Nassau County Administrative Code, § 5-53.0, subd. 4). It makes no difference that the parties and even the courts below were understandably not aware of the amendment to the applicable statute. All were charged with the law extant. See, generally, as to strict compliance with.statutes of like kind (Clason v. Baldwin, 152 N. Y. 204, 210 ; Matter of Vivenzio v. City of Utica, 58 Misc 2d 571, 572 , affd. 33 A D 2d 657).
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.