TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. C. Penney Co. v. Lewisohn

In the Matter of J. C. Penney Co., Inc. v. Richard Lewisohn, as Finance Administrator of the City of New York

J. C. Penney Co. v. Lewisohn, 301 N.E.2d 421 (N.Y. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 2, 1973
Citations
301 N.E.2d 42133 N.Y.2d 528347 N.Y.S.2d 4331973 N.Y. LEXIS 1122
Cited by 6 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed,. without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Jasen, Gtabrielli, Jones and Wachtler. - Taking no part: Judge Breitel.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 21988: 21990: 12021: 119772026peak 1977 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. SIN, Inc. v. Department of Finance523 N.E.2d 811 (N.Y. 1988)
  2. Citibank, N. A. v. City of New York Finance Administration372 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1977)
  3. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. New York City Department of Finance139 Misc. 2d 1093 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1988)
  4. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. New York City Department of Finance563 N.E.2d 9 (N.Y. 1990)
  5. Citibank v. CITY FIN. ADMIN.43 N.Y.2d 425 (1977)
  6. SGR Winddown, Inc., a Delaware corporationNo. 19-11973 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 8, 2021)

Most recent

  1. SGR Winddown, Inc., a Delaware corporationNo. 19-11973 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 8, 2021)
  2. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. New York City Department of Finance563 N.E.2d 9 (N.Y. 1990)
  3. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. New York City Department of Finance139 Misc. 2d 1093 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1988)
  4. SIN, Inc. v. Department of Finance523 N.E.2d 811 (N.Y. 1988)
  5. Citibank v. CITY FIN. ADMIN.43 N.Y.2d 425 (1977)
  6. Citibank, N. A. v. City of New York Finance Administration372 N.E.2d 789 (N.Y. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list