People v. Price
The People of the State of New York v. Cheryl L. Price
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The order of the Appellate Terra should be reversed, and the information dismissed. Statutes punishing indecent exposure, though broadly drawn, must be carefully construed to attack the particular evil at which they are directed (Matter of Excelsior Pictures Corp. v. Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y., 3 N Y 2d 237, 244-245). Section 245.01 of the Penal Law was aimed at discouraging “ topless ” waitresses and their promoters (see Practice Commentary by Denzer and McQuillan, McKinney’s Cons. Laws of N. Y., Book 39, Penal Law, § 245.01, p. 200). It should not be applied to the noncommercial, perhaps accidental, and certainly not lewd, exposure alleged (see People v. Ulman, 258 App. Div. 262, 263 ). Certainly, legislation may not control the manner of dress, absent commercial exploitation of exposure, or absent conduct or dress under circumstances creating or likely to create public disorder.
Order reversed, etc.
Chief Judge Ftjld and Judges Burke, Breitel, Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler concur in Per Curiam opinion.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts3
- State Specialty Courts1
- State Attorney General Opinions1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.