TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

People v. Ketchum

The People of the State of New York v. Jesse Ketchum

People v. Ketchum, 320 N.E.2d 645 (N.Y. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 23, 1974
Citations
320 N.E.2d 64535 N.Y.2d 740361 N.Y.S.2d 9111974 N.Y. LEXIS 1245

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Memobakdum. The order appealed from should be affirmed.

The record discloses examples of grievous misconduct by the prosecution in cross-examination and summation which we strongly condemn. However, since the overwhelming proof is all but conclusive of defendant’s guilt, and the misconduct does not reflect a pattern throughout the trial, but rather reactions at certain times of stress, reversal is not warranted.

Chief Judge Bbeitel and Judges Gabbielli, Jokes, Wachtlek, Rabik and Steveks concur; Judge Jasek taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 41976: 31977: 11980: 11987: 11990: 11995: 11997: 119752026peak 1975 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ketchum v. Ward422 F. Supp. 934 (W.D.N.Y. 1976)
  2. Ketchum v. Ward391 F. Supp. 332 (W.D.N.Y. 1975)
  3. People v. Alicea338 N.E.2d 625 (N.Y. 1975)
  4. People v. Mullin51 A.D.2d 558 (1976)
  5. People v. Roseman78 A.D.2d 878 (1980)
  6. People v. Knights135 A.D.2d 907 (1987)

Most recent

  1. People v. Roldan238 A.D.2d 255 (1997)
  2. People v. Johnson212 A.D.2d 362 (1995)
  3. People v. Hernandez162 A.D.2d 549 (1990)
  4. People v. Knights135 A.D.2d 907 (1987)
  5. People v. Roseman78 A.D.2d 878 (1980)
  6. People v. Varisco57 A.D.2d 596 (1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list