TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Syracuse Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education

Syracuse Teachers Association, Incorporated v. Board of Education, Syracuse City School District, and Third-Party Comptroller of the State of New York, Third-Party

Syracuse Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ., 320 N.E.2d 646 (N.Y. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Subsequent history: rev'd sub nom. Dunaway v. New York, 442 U.S. 200 (1979). (read from the later opinion; check before relying)

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 23, 1974
Citations
320 N.E.2d 64635 N.Y.2d 743361 N.Y.S.2d 9121974 N.Y. LEXIS 124788 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2112

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: One should construe the language in Board of Educ. of Town of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington (30 N Y 2d 122, 130) to mean that collective bargaining under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, § 204, subd. 1) has broad scope with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, limited by plain and clear, rather than express, prohibitions in the statute or decisional law (see, generally, Matter of West Irondequoit Teachers Assn. v. Helsby, 35 N Y 2d 46, citing and discussing *745 the Huntington case). Even so, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Wither at the Appellate Division the collective bargaining agreement in suit validly provided for a “ Sick Leave Bank ”.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones, Waohtler, Babin and Stevens. Taking no part: Judge Jasen,

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 59 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 41976: 101977: 51978: 71979: 61982: 11983: 21985: 51986: 11988: 21989: 41990: 21993: 11995: 11996: 11997: 11999: 12004: 12005: 12006: 22013: 119752026peak 1976 · 10

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list