TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

La Londe v. Modern Album & Finishing Co.

Guy La Londe v. Modern Album and Finishing Company, Inc., Appellant-Respondent

La Londe v. Modern Album & Finishing Co., 321 N.E.2d 551 (N.Y. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 20, 1974
Citations
321 N.E.2d 55135 N.Y.2d 804362 N.Y.S.2d 4601974 N.Y. LEXIS 1205

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division on the appeal after the first trial. As to plaintiff’s cross appeal, see CPLR 5501 (subd. [b]).

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel, and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtleb, Rabin and Stevens.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 11998: 119892026peak 1989 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Horn & Hardart Co. v. Pillsbury Co.703 F. Supp. 1062 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)
  2. Pail v. Precise Imports Corp.256 A.D.2d 73 (1998)

Most recent

  1. Pail v. Precise Imports Corp.256 A.D.2d 73 (1998)
  2. Horn & Hardart Co. v. Pillsbury Co.703 F. Supp. 1062 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list