Council of Supervisors & Administrators of the Public Schools v. Board of Education
In the Matter of the Council of Supervisors and Administrators of the Public Schools of New York City, and Community School Boards Districts Nos. 8, 13, 31, Intervenors-Appellants v. Board of Education of the City of New York
Council of Supervisors & Administrators of the Pub. Schs. v. Bd. of Educ., 322 N.E.2d 273 (N.Y. 1974)
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabbiblli, Jones, Waohtler, Babin and Stevens.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1450, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,633, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,091 Boston M. Chance, and Louis C. Mercado, Individually on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Examiners and the Board of Education of the City of New York, and Council of Supervisors and Administrators of the City of New York, Local 1, Sasco, Afl-Cio
- Chance v. Board of Examiners & the Board of Education
- New York City School Boards Ass'n v. Board of Education
- Board of Education v. Fernandez
- NYC SCH. BDS. v. Bd. of Educ.
Most recent
- Board of Education v. Fernandez
- 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1450, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,633, 12 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 11,091 Boston M. Chance, and Louis C. Mercado, Individually on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Examiners and the Board of Education of the City of New York, and Council of Supervisors and Administrators of the City of New York, Local 1, Sasco, Afl-Cio
- NYC SCH. BDS. v. Bd. of Educ.
- New York City School Boards Ass'n v. Board of Education
- Chance v. Board of Examiners & the Board of Education
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.