People v. Copeland
The People of the State of New York v. Don Copeland
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.
In the early morning hours a patrolman stopped the automobile defendant was driving after it had been observed weaving from lane to lane. On being asked for his driver’s license, defendant stated that he did not possess a license, and he was thereupon arrested for violation of section 509 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (CPL 140.10, subd 1, par [a]). Further inquiry disclosed that defendant carried no identification. The arresting officer then frisked him, and when defendant emptied his pockets the contraband fell out.
Without the available data on which to prepare a uniform *987 traffic summons and confronted with the driver of a weaving car who possessed no operator’s license, we can only conclude that this arrest was warranted and that the search of defendant’s person incident thereto was surely lawful (cf. People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476 ). Accordingly, the motion to suppress was properly denied.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(holding that arrest and search during traffic stop were lawful because defendant stated he did not possess license)
-
(when asked for registration, “operator shall furnish to ... police officer any information necessary for the identification of such vehicle and its owner”)
Cited by 32 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- Federal District Courts3
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts17
- State Trial Courts6
- State Specialty Courts1
- State Attorney General Opinions1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.