TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Claim of Winslow

In the Matter of the Claim of Harry Winslow, Phillip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner

In re the Claim of Winslow, 385 N.E.2d 535 (N.Y. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 28, 1978
Citations
385 N.E.2d 53545 N.Y.2d 983412 N.Y.S.2d 7951978 N.Y. LEXIS 2395

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision of the appeal board denying benefits which was affirmed at the Appellate Division. Nor did the failure of the employer’s plant manager to appear at the hearing in response to the direction in the hearing notice constitute a denial of due process to claimant. Claimant made no request for such appearance prior to or at the hearing.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list