Spillman v. Spillman

Louise R. Spillman, Also Known as Louise S. Bryant v. Richard W. Spillman

Spillman v. Spillman, 402 N.E.2d 1172 (N.Y. 1980)

Court: New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided: February 7, 1980
Citations: 402 N.E.2d 117249 N.Y.2d 745426 N.Y.S.2d 2711980 N.Y. LEXIS 2112

Cited by 4

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we cannot say that the Appellate Division’s conclusion that the reconstructed record was adequate for its review was erroneous as a matter of law.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 4 cases

View all citing references →

State Appellate Courts4

Relies on it most ⓘ

Salas v. Salas128 A.D.2d 849 (1987)
Brown v. Brown122 A.D.2d 762 (1986)
Smith v. Smith88 A.D.2d 658 (1982)
In re the Claim of Carrara241 A.D.2d 716 (1997)

Most recent

In re the Claim of Carrara241 A.D.2d 716 (1997)
Salas v. Salas128 A.D.2d 849 (1987)
Brown v. Brown122 A.D.2d 762 (1986)
Smith v. Smith88 A.D.2d 658 (1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list