Cohn v. National Broadcasting Co.
Roy M. Cohn v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order appealed from should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Fein at the Appellate Division ( 67 AD2d 140 ).
We agree with the court below that none of the individual passages of which plaintiffs complain are defamatory as to them. We would add only that in our view the cumulative effect of all of such passages cannot be said to be defamatory. While it is true that the courts " 'will not strain’ to interpret [allegedly defamatory works] 'in their mildest and most inoffensive sense to hold them nonlibelous’ ” (November v Time Inc., 13 NY2d 175, 178 , quoting Mencher v Chesley, 297 NY 94, 99 ), it is also true that courts will not strain to find a defamatory interpretation where none exists (see Tracy v Newsday, Inc., 5 NY2d 134 ).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(directing courts not to “strain to find a defamatory interpretation where none exists”)
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals3
- Federal District Courts7
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts15
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.