People v. Levin
The People of the State of New York v. Benjamin Levin
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The indictment charges the defendant with larceny in the language of the statute and thus cannot be said to be insufficient on its face (People v Cohen, 52 NY2d 584 ). Any issue concerning the proper interpretation or application of the statute was forfeited by the guilty plea.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur; Judge Meyer taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 34 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.