Harder v. McGinn
Marion G. Harder v. Arthur F. McGinn, Jr., P. C.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 89 AD2d 732 ; see Levine v Graphic Scanning Corp., 87 AD2d 755 ; Cronin v Scott, 78 AD2d 745).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(former spouse of attorney-defendant’s client could not sue for attorney’s negligent representation of spouse-client on theory that spouse-client owed money to non-client spouse)
Cited by 17 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.