Kuczka v. Clark
In the Matter of Kenneth A. Kuczka v. John V. Clark, as Commissioner of the Erie County Department of Personnel
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 86 AD2d 980 ). Nor do we find any basis to disturb the determination implicit in the disposition in that court that appellant’s allegations of delay on the part of respondent commissioner in establishing the civil service list do not provide equitable grounds for the relief that he seeks.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(interpreting a section of New York's Civil Service Law)
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Doyle v. Suffolk County
- State v. Shabazz
- John Doyle, Barbara McCuen William T. Milne, Frank Misiano, John J. Presta, Kevin Sweeney, George Lynn, Frederick Slanovec, Chris Innes, and John Considine, for Themselves and for All Persons Similarly Situated v. Suffolk County, Suffolk County Civil Service Commission, and Suffolk County Police Department, and State of New York
Most recent
- State v. Shabazz
- John Doyle, Barbara McCuen William T. Milne, Frank Misiano, John J. Presta, Kevin Sweeney, George Lynn, Frederick Slanovec, Chris Innes, and John Considine, for Themselves and for All Persons Similarly Situated v. Suffolk County, Suffolk County Civil Service Commission, and Suffolk County Police Department, and State of New York
- Doyle v. Suffolk County
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.