TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Estate of Ragone

In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph A. Ragone, Antoinette Viscardi, Josephine Ragone

In re the Estate of Ragone, 447 N.E.2d 76 (N.Y. 1983)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 10, 1983
Citations
447 N.E.2d 7658 N.Y.2d 864460 N.Y.S.2d 5281983 N.Y. LEXIS 2855

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs to all parties appearing separately and filing separate briefs payable out of the estate, and the decree of the Surrogate’s Court, New York County, reinstated for reasons stated in the decision of former Surrogate Millard L. Midonick.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1983: 11986: 11987: 11989: 11992: 11998: 11999: 12000: 12002: 12014: 319832026peak 2014 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re the Estate of Etheridge136 Misc. 2d 233 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1987)
  2. In re the Estate Cord449 N.E.2d 402 (N.Y. 1983)
  3. Viscardi v. Lerner125 A.D.2d 662 (1986)
  4. In re Bieley695 N.E.2d 1119 (N.Y. 1998)
  5. In re the Estate of Friedman146 Misc. 2d 91 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1989)
  6. In re the Estate of Herceg193 Misc. 2d 201 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 2002)

Most recent

  1. In re BNY Mellon47 Misc. 3d 481 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 2014)
  2. MatterofPrevratilNo. 517693 (N.Y. App. Div. July 24, 2014)
  3. In re the Estate of Prevratil121 A.D.3d 137 (2014) · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  4. In re the Estate of Herceg193 Misc. 2d 201 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 2002)
  5. In re the Estate of Bank184 Misc. 2d 322 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 2000)
  6. In re the Estate of Florio182 Misc. 2d 385 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list