Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hospital
Alan S. Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hospital
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted unconditionally.
On this motion by defendant to dismiss the action for the failure of plaintiff for a period of nine months to serve a complaint, plaintiff concedes, as he must, that no affidavit of merits was submitted. Because of this deficiency it was error as a matter of law not to grant the motion to dismiss without condition. (Amodeo v Radler, 59 NY2d 1001 ; Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594, 599 ; Sortino v Fisher, 20 AD2d 25, 31-32 .)
In view of this disposition we have no occasion to address the contentions of the parties as to the reasonableness of the proffered excuse for the delay in serving the complaint.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Simons and Kaye concur; Judge Meyer taking no part.
Order modified, with costs to appellant, in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed. Question certified answered in the negative.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 48 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.