TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Governeur v. Lynch

Governeur v. Lynch, 2 Paige Ch. 300 (1830)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Chancery · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 24, 1830
Citations
2 Paige Ch. 3001830 N.Y. LEXIS 3631830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2
Headnotes
Where lands belonging to several persons are covered by a mortgage given, by the person from whom they derive their titles, .the several parcels' must be sold to satisfy the mortgage in the inverse order of their alienation. The first purchaser from the mortgagor has the prior equity, although the consideration was not actually, paid until after other portions of the lands had been purchased and paid for. - , -If a vendee is in possession of lands, under a contract to purchase, a subse- ' quent purchaser or mortgagee has constructive notice of his equitable rights, and takes the land subject to his prior equity.' If the purchase money has been paid by a vendee before a subsequent mortgage is recorded, the mortgagee will have no claim upon the land. If a part of the purchase money remains unpaid at the time the mortgage is recorded, such mortgagee will have an equitable lien on the land to the extent of the unpaid purchase money.
Summary
This was a bill of foreclosure. The defendant Lynch gave á mortgage upon a large trapt of land, part of which was under contracts for sale previous to the date of the mortgage. The purchasers at the date of the mortgage were in. possession and had paid considerable portions- of the purchase ■ money. They have since paid the residue to the mortgágor. Other parts of the lands were afterwards sold to various other persons who are made defendants in this suit.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Chancellor.

Where lands belonging to several persons are covered by a mortgage given by the person from whom they all derive their titles, the lands last s.old by him ' are first liable to satisfy the incumbrance ; and the several • parcels must be sold by the master in the inverse order of their alienation. Where the purchase money has been paid in good faith, the first purchaser has the prior equity, although the consideration was not actually paid until after other portions of the lands had been purchased and paid for by the vendee.

■ If a vendee is in possession of land, under a contract to purchase, a subsequent purchaser or mortgagee has construe-.., *301 tive notice of his equitable rights ; and takes the land subject to his prior equity. (5 John. Ch. R. 29. 4 Little’s R. 317. I Munro’s R. 301.) If the purchase money has been paid before notice of and prior to the recording of a subsequent mortgage, the mortgagee will have no claim upon the land. Where a part remains unpaid, he will have an equitable lien thereon to the extent of the unpaid purchase money.

The decree in this case must be drawn up in conformity to these principles; and if the lands not contracted for at the date of the mortgage are insufficient to pay the amount due to the complainant, with costs, the master must ascertain and report the amount of the purchase money which was due on . the other lots at the time of the registry of the mortgage.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 41 cases

View all citing references →
1840–1841: 11842–1843: 31844–1845: 21848–1849: 11852–1853: 11854–1855: 61858–1859: 21860–1861: 31862–1863: 21868–1869: 21870–1871: 11872–1873: 11874–1875: 11876–1877: 21878–1879: 21882–1883: 21886–1887: 11890–1891: 31894–1895: 11932–1933: 11938–1939: 11984–1985: 12012–2013: 118402026peak 1854 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Moyer v. Hinman13 N.Y. 180 (1855) · Concurrence
  2. Hamilton v. Fowlkes16 Ark. 340 (1855)
  3. Smith v. Gage41 Barb. 60 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1863)
  4. Trustees of Union College v. Wheeler61 N.Y. 88 (1874) · Concurrence
  5. Mobile Marine Dock & Mutual Insurance v. Huder35 Ala. 713 (1860)
  6. Moyer v. Hinman17 Barb. 137 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1853)

Most recent

  1. Walls v. Humphries2013 Ark. 286, 428 S.W.3d 517
  2. Waldorff Ins. & Bonding v. Eglin Nat. Bank453 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
  3. Poole v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land Bank5 S.E.2d 368 (Ga. 1939)
  4. McDonnell v. Holden185 N.E. 572 (Ill. 1933)
  5. Colvin v. Shaw29 N.Y.S. 644 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1894)
  6. Aurora National Bank v. Black29 N.E. 396 (Ind. 1891)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list