Pool v. Pool
Pool v. Pool, 2 Edw. Ch. 192 (1834)
Headnotes
to cuita for separation, where the complainant provea hii or her case, the form of the decretal order settled by chancellor Kent is to be used.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
A suit for limited divorce; the case was proved; and the solicitor for the complainant brought the draft of the proposed decree for the approval of the vice-chancellor: when His Honor required it should be made conformable to the decretal order which appears in the printed report of Barrere v . Barrere, 4. J. C. R. 187. and suggested its being a desirable form to be used in all similar cases.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.