TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clark v. Phelps

Clark against Phelps and others

Clark v. Phelps, 6 Johns. Ch. 214 (1822)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Chancery · State Highest Courts
Decided
August 1, 1822
Citations
6 Johns. Ch. 2141822 N.Y. LEXIS 1791822 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 44
Headnotes
A defendant cannot plead or answer, and demur both to the whole bill, or the same part of a bill.
Summary
CASE submitted upon the bill and answer, and demurrer, on the points presented by the demurrer.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

The Chancellor said, that the answer and the demurrer each went to the whole bill; and it is a settled rule in pleading, that a defendant cannot plead or answer, and demur to the same matter; the former will overrule the latter. It is inconsistent for a defendant to say, he ought not to answer to a bill; and yet to answer it fully. The rule appears in all the books that treat on the subject. (3 P. Wms. 80, 81. 2 Atk. 284. Cooler’s Tr. of Pl. 113. Beames' Plead. 40.) The demurrer was consequently overruled, and^the question of costs reserved.

Order accordingly. -

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1869–1870: 21881–1882: 11905–1906: 118692026peak 1869 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wade v. Pulsifer54 Vt. 45 (1881)
  2. Fisher v. Scholte30 Iowa 221 (1870)
  3. McDevitt v. Connell63 A. 504 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1906)
  4. Pieri v. Mayor of Shieldsboro42 Miss. 493 (1869)

Most recent

  1. McDevitt v. Connell63 A. 504 (N.J. Ct. of Ch. 1906)
  2. Wade v. Pulsifer54 Vt. 45 (1881)
  3. Fisher v. Scholte30 Iowa 221 (1870)
  4. Pieri v. Mayor of Shieldsboro42 Miss. 493 (1869)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list