Wilkinson v. Jeffers & Cothrans
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
*154 By the Court Lumpkin, J.,
delivering the opinion.
The only question in this ease is, whether a negotiable note being transferred by the payee, as collateral security, after maturity, the maker can plead a set-off against the payee, to an action at the instance of the holder ?
The point has been fully and satisfactorily discussed upon the cases. And while it is true that there is a conflict of authority both in England and in this country, the better opinion seems to be, that the defense is not admissible; and such has been the uniform tenor of the decisions in this State. Story on Prom. Notes, see. 186-195 and note; Chitty on Bills, 74; 3 Burrow, 1663; 2 Kelly, 92 ; 3 ib., 47; 4 ib., 428; 18 Ga. Rep., 650 ; 22 Ga. Rep., 246 ; 27 Ga. Rep., 20 ; Wheaton’s Sel. Vol. 132; Chitty on Bills, 5-226; Story on Prom. Notes, 178; 5 Cowen, 231; Creswell, 558; 3 Vermont, 540; Swift vs. Tyson, 16 Peters, 1 ; 20 Hon. C. 5 Rep., 243; 6 Cush. Rep., 469 ; Story on Bills, 192; 8 Metcl'f, 40; 3 Cush. Rep., 162 ; 20 Vermont, 569.
The legal title to the note is vested by the transfer in the holder, and notwithstanding the paper be over due, no equity can be set up outside the contract itself.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.