TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Whittle v. Newman

L. N. Whittle, in error v. Elisha N. Newman, in error

Whittle v. Newman, 34 Ga. 377 (1866)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Georgia · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 15, 1866
Judges
Walker
Citations
34 Ga. 377
Headnotes
An attorney cannot collect hie fee by ruling bis client, though the latter may have possessed himself of the entire fund recovered by the litigation, in respect to which the services were rendered.
Summary
Eule by Attorney against his Client. In Twiggs Superior Court. September Term, 1865. The entire record sent up in this case was as follows: “ Twiggs Supebiob Ooubt, September Term, 1865. “ On motion of counsel for plaintiff, it is ordered that Dr. Elisha N. Mewman show cause on to-morrow morning, if any he have, why he should not pay to L. N. Whittle, as counsel for plaintiff in a case in Twiggs Superior Court, wherein said Newman was plaintiff and the State of Georgia defendant, the sum of three hundred dollars for his counsel fees, and the sum of fifteen dollars paid by said Whittle to take interrogatories in said case. “ By the Court. Sept. 25th, 1865. L. N. WHITTLE, Atfcy. for self.” “ We consent that the original papers in this case may be used in the Supreme Court in lieu of a writ of error, it being admitted that Dr. Newman went to Milledgeville, received the money, and paid Messrs. Solomon & Crocker their fees of $500 each, all by consent of S. & C., who were retained in the ease; but all this without the knowledge or consent of said Whittle. L. N. WHITTLE, Pl’ff’s Att’y. HARRIS & HUNTER, Def’t’s Att’ys.”

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Walker

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Walker, J.

[1.] This was a proceeding to enforce, by rule, an attorney’s lien upon funds which had been received by his client from the opposite party. “ The attorney’s lien shall attach for his fees and for a general balance on all sums collected, by him, and upon all property recovered by his services, and shall be superior to all other liens thereon.” Code, 1989. That the attorney had a lien upon the money received from the State— “ the property recovered by his services,” is very clear: the only question is as to whether he can enforce it by rule. In this case, he insists that unless he can enforce it by rule he is without remedy. He predicates his proceeding upon the 1th paragraph of sec. 200 of the Code, which says, “ Every Court has power to control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its officers, and all other' persons connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto.” We do not think this applies to the reception of *379 money by the party after the litigation has ended. When there is no longer any judicial proceeding pending before the Court, we can not very well see how a Court can control persons in transacting their ordinary business affairs. This case seems to present a great hardship ; but we do not know any power in the Courts to grant the relief prayed for. The judgment of the Court below refusing the motion must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1904: 11929: 11930: 11981: 119042026peak 1904 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Haygood v. Haden46 S.E. 625 (Ga. 1904)
  2. Henson & Henson, P.C. v. Myszka286 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
  3. Breen v. Phillips149 S.E. 565 (Ga. 1929)
  4. Barge v. Ownby153 S.E. 49 (Ga. 1930)

Most recent

  1. Henson & Henson, P.C. v. Myszka286 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
  2. Barge v. Ownby153 S.E. 49 (Ga. 1930)
  3. Breen v. Phillips149 S.E. 565 (Ga. 1929)
  4. Haygood v. Haden46 S.E. 625 (Ga. 1904)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list