McCrary & Co. v. Austell, Inman & Co.
McCrary & Company, in error v. Austell, Inman & Company, in error
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Montgomery, Judge.
We think the facts of this case show that there was “an honest mistake of the law as to the effect of the instrument on the part of both contracting parties,” and that “ such mistake operates as a gross injustice to one, and gives an un *452 conscious advantage to the other.” The case is, therefore, relievable in equity: Code, section 3067. Equity having acquired jurisdiction to reform, will retain it to foreclose the mortgage.
Judgment affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.